“The Dark Side of the Good Lord”

3 Lent

March 15, 2009

 

The Dark Side of the Good Lord

by John Christianson

 

John 2:13-22

 

  • 13The Passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14In the temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables. 15Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple, both the sheep and the cattle. He also poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16He told those who were selling the doves, “Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!” 17His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for your house will consume me.” 18The Jews then said to him, “What sign can you show us for doing this?” 19Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” 20The Jews then said, “This temple has been under construction for forty-six years, and will you raise it up in three days?” 21But he was speaking of the temple of his body. 22After he was raised from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this; and they believed the scripture and the word that Jesus had spoken.

 

According to the old story, the pope called all of his staff together, and he said, “I have good news and I have bad news.  First the good news:  the angel Gabriel appeared to me and he announced not only that Jesus will return tomorrow, but he’s coming to Rome!  The bad news:  he’s really ticked off!”

 

Change the story just a little.  It’s the Jewish high priest.  “Good news:  for two-thousand years we have waited and finally, today, the Messiah is coming to the temple.  The bad news:  he’s really ticked off.”

 

Only now it’s not a joke, is it.  It’s history.  It’s today’s gospel.

 

Ask anybody to describe the Good Lord and they’ll use words like kind, gentle, gracious and mild.  Certainly that’s Biblical.  You can see that side of Jesus in scores of places.  You just can’t find that familiar Bright Side of the Good Lord anywhere in this gospel lesson.  There’s no Good Shepherd here, cuddling a lamb in his arm while he strolls a green pasture.

 

One of our Lord’s twelve disciples was Simon the Zealot – a real radical – probably a terrorist.  The poet, Ezra Pound imagines Simon, describing the dark, but maybe just as admirable side of the Good Lord.  First, you need to know that, in this dialect, the word fere means Mate or Companion.  

 

Now, listen to the Ballad of the Goodly Fere by Ezra Pound

 

Ha' we lost the goodliest fere o' all

For the priests and the gallows tree?

Aye lover he was of brawny men,

O' ships and the open sea.

 

When they came wi' a host to take Our Man

His smile was good to see,

"First let these go!" quo' our Goodly Fere,

"Or I'll see ye damned," says he.

 

Aye he sent us out through the crossed high spears

And the scorn of his laugh rang free,

"Why took ye not me when I walked about

Alone in the town?" says he.

 

Oh we drank his "Hale" in the good red wine

When we last made company,

No capon priest was the Goodly Fere

But a man o' men was he.

 

I ha' seen him drive a hundred men

Wi' a bundle o' cords swung free,

That they took the high and holy house

For their pawn and treasury.

 

They'll no' get him a' in a book I think

Though they write it cunningly;

No mouse of the scrolls was the Goodly Fere

But aye loved the open sea.

 

If they think they ha' snared our Goodly Fere

They are fools to the last degree.

"I'll go to the feast," quo' our Goodly Fere,

"Though I go to the gallows tree."

 

"Ye ha' seen me heal the lame and blind,

And wake the dead," says he,

"Ye shall see one thing to master all:

'Tis how a brave man dies on the tree."

 

A son of God was the Goodly Fere

That bade us his brothers be.

I ha' seen him cow a thousand men.

I have seen him upon the tree.

 

He cried no cry when they drave the nails

And the blood gushed hot and free,

The hounds of the crimson sky gave tongue

But never a cry cried he.

 

I ha' seen him cow a thousand men

On the hills o' Galilee,

They whined as he walked out calm between,

Wi' his eyes like the grey o' the sea,

 

Like the sea that brooks no voyaging

With the winds unleashed and free,

Like the sea that he cowed at Genseret

Wi' twey words spoke' suddently.

 

A master of men was the Goodly Fere,

A mate of the wind and sea,

If they think they ha' slain our Goodly Fere

They are fools eternally.

 

I ha' seen him eat o' the honey-comb

Sin' they nailed him to the tree.

 

Oh, that’s a stirring piece of poetry!  Excuse me if you think I was overly dramatic.  You can’t just read that poem.  You have to DECLARE it!  Because the poem is so powerful, and the Jesus it describes is so powerful and the relationship it describes is so powerful you end up envying even Simon the zealot.

 

Does the poem give a distorted picture of Jesus?   Yes, I guess it does.  Jesus wasn’t usually like he sometimes was.  It’s like today’s gospel lesson about the cleansing of the temple.  Sometimes Jesus got ticked off.  When he did, it was clearly “righteous anger.”  But that’s never the Jesus we see when the poor or powerless came to him – even clearly sinful people.  The eyes of that Jesus didn’t flash anger.  They were warm, deep, understanding and compassionate eyes.  Those were the eyes that it seems children always saw – and also his disciples and the women who traveled with them, and most people.  So, what can we learn from those few passages where Jesus gets angry, like John 2 or Matthew 23?

 

I’d like to pose an example for you.  Suppose there was a beautiful park in your town with a playground for the kids.  Young folks flew kites there and played baseball and touch football, boys and girls walked hand in hand, and there was even a place for old folks to throw horse shoes or play shuffleboard.  Sometimes church groups used the benches for Bible Studies.  A wonderful park!  The only drawback was the square around the old gnarled oak tree.  For some reason, over the years dozens of people had been hit by lightning and killed in that square – nowhere else – just in “lightning square.”  So what would you do about it?  I’ll tell you what I’d do.  I’d recognize that park as a town treasure and enjoy it.  But I’d never set foot inside “lightning square,” and I’d warn others about it.

 

So you ask, what does that have to do with Jesus cleansing the temple?  Well, I think it outlines a principle.  Most of the time in the New Testament we see the Good Shepherd, the Prince of Peace.  That’s the Jesus who’s so easy to love.  Then, once in a while, he flashes righteous anger – always for cause.  Seems to me there were three causes that upset Jesus.

  1. Irreverence or blasphemy against his Father.
  2. Self-righteousness.
  3. Abuse of children or other vulnerable people.

(All three of those faults are present in our text.  No wonder Jesus got upset.)

 

So the lesson here seems quite clear.  If you love the Bright Side of the Good Lord, and you would like to avoid the Dark Side of the Good Lord, then stay out of “lightning square.”  Try to avoid sin of all kinds, for your own good, but especially avoid the three causes that seem to upset Jesus the most.

  1. Irreverence or blasphemy against his Father;
  2. Self-righteousness; and
  3. Abuse of children or other vulnerable people.

 

Let’s stay out of lightning square and bask in the Bright Side of the Good Lord.

 

Amen

 

(Comments to John at john.christianson@stjohnsofmound.org )